How to Bend a Rod

 

4CBC0527-9CF8-4DAA-BFFF-14A12F7BA038

I stumbled upon the quote above the other day and thought that it was worth talking a little bit about “rod load” or, as I prefer to say, “rod bend”.

There is only one thing able of bending a rod: force.

Force is related to mass and acceleration as per the formula: F = m.a.

Mass is the amount of matter of a body; on planet Earth it is equivalent to weight —and, to my knowledge, there aren’t any fly rods available in the Moon. Acceleration is an increase of velocity.

What this formula means is that if a force is applied to an object, that object will increase its velocity.

Back to our fly rod, we need a force to bend it. The needed acceleration comes from the caster’s arm. Mass comes from the weight of the rod itself and of the line being cast. The bigger the mass the bigger the resultant force, if the acceleration applied is the same.

So what is the requirement in a line for it to bend the rod more, for the same acceleration applied to the rod butt? Obviously to increase it mass, i.e. its weight. You don’t need much technology to put more plastic material in a line, do you? In fact if you were a line manufacturer you wouldn’t need to change your production process at all, just put the lines formerly labeled as #6 weight —or even #7— in a spool and box with a #5 on them.

Some time ago, line manufacturers started increasing the weight of their lines, while keeping the same AFFTA number on them —throwing that standard out of the window in the process. It doesn’t have anything to do with technology, but with the inability of the average fly angler to properly use the ever increasing rigidity of modern fly rods. And, IMHO, it isn’t a good idea whatsoever; but that would be a topic for another article.

2 comments on “How to Bend a Rod

  1. Henry K. says:

    I totally agree with what you have written. To add to what you have said about fly fishers up lining their rods to get them to bend/load more, I have found that the discussion is ALWAYS about the line mass/wt being more, and rarely if ever about the taper of the line. A front loaded line will load the rod more effectively than a gradually tapered “presentation” fly line.

    In one recent discussion, a poster said the Rio Gold was a 5.5 wt line when it is actually on the heavy end of the AFTMA 5 wt line scale. Another said he uses the Rio Grande because it is a full line wt heavier, which it is.

    Neither poster commented on the fact that the tapers of the two lines are very different. the Rio Gold has a gradual taper. The Rio Grand is not only a full line wt heavier, its mass is loaded toward the front of the line. Of course it will load the rod better. So there is a lack of understanding of fly line design.

    Whether a fly fisher is going to upload a rod or not, they should choose the fly line taper design for the type of fishing they will be doing. Then they can choose the fly line mass that will load the rod.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s