Holding vs Slipping Anchors


A fly casting student of mine was recently complaining about how tricky it is to train Roll casting on grass. I decided to explain to him the reasons for that with a short video clip and some simple explanations.
As shown on the video below an anchored cast rolls effortlessly while an unanchored one slips backwards creating problems.

Notice that the issue of Roll casting on grass is that the latter does not grip the line as water does, and for the anchor to properly fulfill its tasks it has to hold.

  • If the dead line is moving backwards more energy is required to make it to change direction towards the target than if it were stationary in the first place, as it is the case of a holding anchor.
  • By the time the dead line has finished its slippage the fly is further away from the target than with an anchor that holds in place; covering more distance to reach the target takes more additional energy.
  • The delivery loop has a tendency to get much wider (the line doesn’t follow the rod tip path unless both are properly aligned), increasing air drag and wasting energy again.

To summarize: an anchor on grass doesn’t hold and that issue leads to some waste of energy that translates into a lose in fly line speed on the delivery cast.

My Take On Spey Anchor



About twenty years ago I started studying the mechanics of Spey casting in depth, reading all the material I could find (printed and on-line), watching loads of how-to DVDs and internet videos, and painstakingly analyzing my own casting and that of my students by means of slow motion video.
Over the years I made public some of my studies and, to my surprise, they prompted quite a few dismissing comments on fly casting forums, and, as times went by in the same fashion, I eventually removed all that material from the public view.
Now, many years and four slow motion cameras after, I have remade some of that material at the request of a fellow fly casting instructor.

Continue reading

¿Cañas Spey?

Ninfeando con caña de una mano y lances Spey

Hasta hace diez o doce años, cuando alguien que se iniciaba en la pesca a mosca se compraba una caña se podía estar casi seguro de que sería una 9’ #5. Si había que hacerse con un repuesto podría ser una 9 pies de un número menos o de un número más, para cubrir alguna situación distinta.

Con el tiempo el mercado se fue saturando peligrosamente… ¡y llegó al rescate la pesca a ninfa al hilo! Fue una bendición, porque de la clásica caña 9’ #5 hemos pasado a todo tipo de medidas que van desde los 9’6” a los 11’, con numeraciones desde #1 a #3 o #4. El mercado de las cañas que fueron “tradicionales” ha caído en picado. Como me decía un importante distribuidor hace unos años:

Ha venido Chris Rownes a ofrecerme distribuir su nueva Guideline Fario CRS, ¿pero a quién coño le voy a vender una caña de 9 pies?

Continue reading