Aprender de los errores

 

 

back-problem

Lejos de ser un ejercicio de auto flagelación estas reflexiones se basan en que hay buenos motivos para pensar que se aprende más de los errores que de los éxitos. Mediada la temporada, y con algún importante viaje de pesca a la vista, es el momento de reflexionar sobre algunos fallos para evitarlos en el futuro.

Este artículo previo se quedó corto, lo que sigue a continuación es su secuela:

  • Lanzando ninfas hay que estar bien atento a lo que tenemos encima de la cabeza. Cualquier tipo de vegetación que no plantearía problemas pescando a mosca seca puede ser mortal con moscas pesadas. Inercia lo llaman.
  • Comprueba regularmente el terminal en busca de posibles nudos o picadas. De hecho conviene chequear también las partes más gruesas del bajo: en alguna ocasión he tenido roturas en un tramo del 0,15 en vez de en el 0,10 más abajo —tengo un recuerdo reciente de ello. La vagancia no compensa. 😞
  • No seas remolón a la hora de cambiar/modificar el bajo/terminal si las condiciones lo requieren. Muchas veces transformar una deriva mala en una buena es cuestión de pequeños ajustes en el material. La falta de motivación tras un largo periodo sin tocar un pez conduce a la pereza, y esta última se come la motivación. Parafraseando a Picasso: Cuando llegue la inspiración prefiero que me coja trabajando.
  • Cambiar de lugar en el escenario de pesca llevando la mosca en la mano y algo de línea y bajo colgando de la puntera de la caña pensando en ahorrar tiempo no es una buena idea. La verdad es que se suele perder tiempo en enganches y líos. ¡Debería tatuarme esta máxima en la mano de la caña!
  • Aprende a calcular cuánto puedes tirar hasta romper el terminal. Después de una sesión de lanzado puedes anudar uno de tus bajos de pescar a una rama, un banco del parque o cualquier otro “pez” que haya disponible; luego tira empleando diferentes ángulos con la caña. Si tienes un terminal del 0,17 o más grueso ten cuidado al tirar con el talón de la caña vertical no sea que rompas la puntera. Las sesiones fotográficas interminables seguro que matan peces destinados a ser devueltos, pero bastantes de ellos probablemente ya estaban “muertos” antes de llegar a la sacadera debido a “peleas” interminables.
  • Al entrenar lanzado mira siempre tu lance trasero. Un vadeo algo profundo, ninfas pesadas, bajos largos, terminales finos, lances moderados o largos… por separado o combinados, son proclives a resultar en lances traseros desastrosos, y un lance delantero podrá ser tan bueno como su correspondiente trasero pero no mucho más.

No sé si a ti te convencerá pero yo suelo volver a esta lista con frecuencia. A base de releerla igual aprendo finalmente. 😓😀

Pull Hard Whenever You Can!

lipen

Catch and release practices are being subject to greater scrutiny lately. And rightly so, for releasing a fish doesn’t necessarily mean it will survive if the angler doesn’t take enough care. I wrote something on the subject not long ago:

But in this regard of “releasing alive” there is a point that is missing in both old and new guidelines: sometimes (too many times, judging from what I personally see) the fish destined to be released is, in practical terms, dead before the angler touches it. That old “keep the rod tip up!” we heard so many times in those first fishing days, has the ability of killing as many fish as the neglecting angler-photographer.

There is no problem in shooting some pics or videos of a fish, provided that you bring it to the net quickly. The key is in using the rod properly by varying its effective length. By keeping the rod tip up we exert the minimum force on the fish and the maximum on our wrist. Changing the angle between the rod butt and the imaginary line which connects our hand with the fish, modifies that relationship of forces. I see too many anglers that don’t understand this basic concept.

The following video shows a 2.5 kg brown trout that fell to a #18 nymph on a long 7X (0.10 mm) tippet. Not a suitable diameter, I know, but I didn’t expect that size of fish; had I seen it I’d have resorted to a thicker monofilament. However, by pulling hard whenever I could, I managed to get the trout in the net without any damage, although I was rather “underpinned”. And believe me, that brown fought like crazy.

My point? Taking pics in a sensible way isn’t at odds with proper catch and release practices. It is what happens first what matters the most. So pull hard whenever you can —that is, when the fish stops after a run— decreasing tension when it speeds up again.

Resist Temptation!

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

I am a gear junkie. I mean gear in general, not just fly fishing paraphernalia. The periodical urge of getting a new rod isn’t uncommon, for that reason I quitted browsing catalogs compulsively long ago. But that drive is rather manageable now, after all I already have a lot of sticks, and I am old enough to know that any new addition to that department won’t make me any better at catching fish, nor significantly improve my casting skills. For the price of any top of the range rod, you can get a good number of casting classes that will have a real effect in your abilities.

But photo gear… That seems to ring a different bell inside, and the fact that I own a number of cameras and lenses collected along the last twenty-odd years doesn’t seem to ease that inner itch.

Maybe the explanation for the different strength between those two Visa-burning tendencies is purely rational: rod are just plastic tubes and the differences among them aren’t as radical as we like to think. On the other hand photo camera technology is advancing apparently every month.
Just a bad excuse, I know; a new camera -and the Sony a7S is being particularly tempting in the latest months- as it happens with a new rod, won’t make me any better in the picture making pursuit.

When temptation arises I remind myself of an article about camera/lens choosing I read years ago. One statement by its author remained fixed in my mind:
Before buying new gear you should answer honestly to this simple question: will the limitations I find in my pictures be solved by any of the features of my dreamed camera? Or are those limitations due to lack of technique or artistic prowess?
If you are sincere to yourself you’ll find that most of the time it is the latter, not the first.

So to ease the itch I have found specially useful to browse hard drives and unearth some picture that pleases me. It happens that the following photo is my favourite regarding action shots. And it also happens that it was taken with my first underwater camera -a feature that, at the time, was relatively new in the market- a small point-and-shoot of rather bad image quality.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

This shows me, again, that to shoot something appealing you don’t need any particularly expensive or big equipment, just awareness, a good knowledge of how your tool works, and being quick in recognizing and grasping fleeting opportunities. Pure luck doesn’t do any harm either.

So no, Santa, I don’t want that Sage X nor that Sony a7s! Yet!

Beauty

A whole day devoted to the big ones. Failure: some missed takes and a couple of them felt for just a second; it seems that when they close their mouth it is already late.I can’t blame the river spirits, it was entirely my fault.
Best one was 1 Kg; he only responded to perfect drift after perfect drift after perfect drift of a #24 olive dun. With so many natural insects going down the current, why should it be interested in my fly?

Shot with a GoPro and edited on the fly with PS Express for iPad. It isn’t tinted or over saturated, as you can check by the (more or less) natural color of the fingertips. Beauty.